HomeBusinessSupreme Court Refuses to Stay UPI MDR, Asks Centre, RBI and NPCI...

Supreme Court Refuses to Stay UPI MDR, Asks Centre, RBI and NPCI Whether It Is a ‘Tax or Fee’

Published on

4 min read

New Delhi, September 28: The Supreme Court on Monday declined to put on hold the new Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on high-value UPI payments, but asked the Centre, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) to explain the legal basis for the charge. The 0.4% fee on merchant payments above Rs 2,000 is due to take effect on October 15.

Key highlights

  • No stay: The court refused an interim stay, so the October 15 rollout is not blocked for now.
  • Notices issued: The Centre, RBI and NPCI have been asked to respond. The Week reports they must file an affidavit on the factual basis for the charge.
  • Bench: Chief Justice Surya Kant with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana.
  • Key question: The bench asked whether the MDR is a tax, a fee or something else, and on what executive authority it is being levied.
  • Government’s stand: The Additional Solicitor General said it is neither a tax nor a fee, but a settlement charge among payment players.

What happened in court

The petition, filed by advocate Anjan Datta according to The Week, challenges the decision to start levying MDR on person-to-merchant UPI payments above Rs 2,000. When the matter came up on Monday, the bench pressed the government on the character of the charge. “If not a fee, what is the executive basis for making this expropriation?” the court asked, as reported by The Week.

Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General N Venkataraman told the court: “It’s not a tax or a fee.” According to Business Today, he described it as a settlement fee among the players in the payment chain, facilitated by NPCI, and said the government earns no revenue from it. He compared it with the costs merchants already bear on debit and credit card transactions.

Justice Bagchi was not fully persuaded. “It’s not a fee, then what is the character?” he asked, Business Today reported. The bench declined to stay the rollout at this stage, issued notices and sought the authorities’ reply before taking the matter further. The reports did not mention a date for the next hearing.

What the new UPI charge is

The charge was announced earlier this month (see our explainer). Its main features, as reported:

  • A 0.4% MDR on person-to-merchant (P2M) UPI payments above Rs 2,000, paid by the merchant, not the customer.
  • A cap of Rs 300 per transaction, which Business Today says applies to payments of Rs 75,000 and above.
  • A flat Rs 5 per transaction for specified essential sectors such as railways, telecom, insurance, fuel and agricultural inputs.
  • A 0.02% rate on investment-related payments, also capped at Rs 300, according to Business Today.
  • Person-to-person transfers and merchant payments up to Rs 2,000 remain free. The Week reports the charge applies to merchants with monthly receipts above Rs 1 lakh, and that about 96% of transactions fall below the Rs 2,000 threshold.

Why the case matters

Merchant UPI payments have carried no MDR since January 2020, when the government mandated zero charges on UPI and RuPay debit card transactions to push digital payments. That zero-cost model helped make UPI the default way Indians pay, from street vendors to large retailers. The court’s question about the “executive basis” for the new charge goes to the heart of the challenge: whether a levy of this kind can be introduced without clearer legal backing.

For most small shopkeepers the change will matter little, because everyday UPI payments are mostly below Rs 2,000. The bigger impact is on retailers, service providers and online sellers who routinely accept larger payments. Some of them may try to recover the cost through higher prices.

What happens next

With no stay in place, the charge remains on track to start on October 15 unless the court orders otherwise after hearing the government, RBI and NPCI. Merchants should plan on that basis while the legal challenge continues. We will update this story as the case progresses.

Sources

Written by
Business Desk

The Business Desk covers markets, the economy, companies and personal finance. Stories are checked against at least two credible sources before publication.

Latest News

Latest News

Asia Briefing, 6 October: Makkah Defence Pact Activated, Philippine Inflation Hits 7.2%, PTI March Reaches Kohat and a Film Divides South Korea

The main stories from across Asia on Tuesday, 6 October 2026: Pakistan and Türkiye agree to send forces to Saudi Arabia, Philippine inflation jumps to 7.2%, the PTI march reaches Kohat, a film about a 1974 assassination divides South Korea, and Malaysia approves the return of 3,524 more Myanmar nationals.

Nobel Prize in Medicine 2026 Goes to Deisseroth, Hegemann and Nagel for Optogenetics, the Method That Controls Brain Cells With Light

The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine has gone to Karl Deisseroth, Peter Hegemann and Georg Nagel for optogenetics, which lets scientists switch nerve cells on and off with light. A treatment for blindness based on it is under review in the United States. Several pioneers, including Zhuo-Hua Pan, who began his career in China, were left out.

INDIA गठबंधन के सांसद आज संसद भवन से चुनाव आयोग तक मार्च करेंगे, CEC ज्ञानेश कुमार को हटाने की मांग; सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा,...

विपक्षी INDIA गठबंधन के सांसद मंगलवार सुबह 11 बजे संसद भवन से निर्वाचन सदन तक मार्च करेंगे। मांग मुख्य चुनाव आयुक्त ज्ञानेश कुमार को हटाने की है। विपक्ष का आरोप है कि मतदाता सूची के विशेष गहन पुनरीक्षण (SIR) के 14 फैसले दो चुनाव आयुक्तों की आपत्ति के बावजूद लिए गए।

South Korea’s Culture Minister Calls Threats Over ‘The Assassins’ a ‘Destruction of Democracy’ as Conservatives Demand the Film Be Pulled

A South Korean film about the 1974 killing of first lady Yuk Young-soo has drawn protests outside an actor's home and demands from the conservative opposition that it be withdrawn. The culture minister has asked police to protect the cast and rejected calls to stop screenings as a return to censorship.

Related Coverage

Asia Is Most Exposed if the AI Boom Turns, AMRO Warns, Even as It Holds Regional Growth at 4.1%

AMRO, the economic watchdog for Southeast Asia, China, Japan and South Korea, kept its regional growth forecast at 4.1% for 2026 and raised 2027 to 4.1%, while warning that the same AI boom lifting exports could cause financial stress if it reverses.

Takaichi Calls China an ‘Important Neighbour’ and Promises a Food Tax Cut Without New Debt as Japan’s Parliament Opens

Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi opened a 69-day Diet session by calling China an "important neighbour", promising a two-year cut in the food consumption tax from 8% to 1% without new deficit bonds, and pledging a population strategy by year-end.

Asia Briefing, 5 October: PTI March Sets Off, Asian Games Close, Flydubai Probe Widens and Yemen’s Government Launches an Offensive

The main stories from across Asia on Monday, 5 October 2026: Imran Khan’s party begins its march, the Asian Games end in Nagoya, the Flydubai investigation reaches Australia, Yemen’s government goes on the offensive and Indonesia arrests 12 terror suspects.