HomeAsiaPentagon Designates Confucius Institutes a National Security Threat: What It Means

Pentagon Designates Confucius Institutes a National Security Threat: What It Means

Published on

4 min read

WASHINGTON, October 25: The US Defense Department has designated China-funded Confucius Institutes a threat to national security, the latest step in a years-long campaign against the cultural centres on American campuses. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the move in a video posted on social media on October 23, saying “80 new propaganda cells across 30 universities had popped up using different names and different charters.”

Key highlights

  • Hegseth said the Pentagon has added Confucius Institutes to its list of institutions that threaten US national security.
  • He alleged that 80 rebranded entities had appeared at 30 universities after earlier closures.
  • He said the department had “systematically dismantled every single one of these organizations” over the past two months.
  • The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
  • The move builds on a 2020 State Department designation and a 2018 law limiting Pentagon funding for universities that host the institutes.

What Hegseth said

In the video, Hegseth accused the institutes of operating in disguise at US universities after many were formally shut down. He said their mission was “to steal intellectual property and to infiltrate the minds of American students”, and that the department, which the administration also calls the Department of War, had moved against all 80 entities it identified in the past two months.

The announcement did not set out in detail what the designation changes in practice, such as which contracts, grants or research partnerships are affected. Universities that hold Defense Department research funding will be watching for that guidance.

How we got here

Confucius Institutes are Chinese-government-funded centres that teach Chinese language and culture in partnership with host universities. The first in the United States opened at the University of Maryland in 2004, and at their peak in the late 2010s there were about 100 on American campuses. Critics in Congress argued that they gave Beijing influence over teaching and campus debate; supporters said they were language programmes similar to those run by other countries.

Confucius Institutes in the US: timeline
DateStep
2004The first US Confucius Institute opens at the University of Maryland.
August 2018The defence authorisation law for fiscal year 2019 restricts Pentagon funding for Chinese-language programmes at universities that host Confucius Institutes.
August 13, 2020The State Department designates the Confucius Institute US Center a foreign mission of China.
Early 2020sMost US universities close their Confucius Institutes.
August 2026The Pentagon orders research-security audits at 30 US academic institutions.
October 23, 2026Hegseth announces that Confucius Institutes are designated a national security threat.

Our calculation: 80 entities across 30 universities works out to an average of about 2.7 per campus — a sign, if the figures hold, that the department is counting successor programmes, centres and partnerships rather than only institutes that kept the Confucius name.

Why it matters for Asia

The designation comes weeks before China hosts the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders’ meeting in Shenzhen in November, and adds another irritant to US–China relations at a time when both sides are trying to manage trade and technology disputes.

Confucius Institutes still operate widely across Asia, including in Southeast Asia, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, where they are generally presented as language and scholarship programmes. In India, the Education Ministry in 2020 began reviewing the agreements under which Confucius Institutes and Chinese-language centres operated at several universities. Washington’s step is likely to sharpen debate in other countries about how to separate language teaching from state influence — and about whether rebranding a programme changes what it is.

What to watch

  • Written Pentagon guidance on what the designation means for universities with defence research funding.
  • A formal response from China’s Foreign Ministry or its embassy in Washington.
  • Whether Congress moves to write the designation into law.
  • Whether the issue is raised around APEC in Shenzhen.

File photo: Official portrait of Pete Hegseth, January 2025. Image: Chad McNeeley, US Department of Defense, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. Photo source

Sources

Written by
International Desk

The International Desk covers world and Asian affairs, diplomacy and conflict, with a focus on what they mean for India. Stories are checked against at least two credible sources before publication.

Latest News

Latest News

France and Italy Protest Update: Strike Calls and Security Moves

PARIS/ROME, October 25: France’s CGT union has renewed its call for a major strike...

ICC Wins 2026 Sakharov Prize as Europe Debates Court Protection

STRASBOURG, October 25: The European Parliament has awarded the 2026 Sakharov Prize for Freedom...

Media Literacy Week 2026: Why Asia’s Digital Users Matter

PARIS, October 25: Global Media and Information Literacy Week has begun, with UNESCO’s 2026...

US Proposes Wider Technology Investment Curbs; China Objects

WASHINGTON, October 25: A new US Treasury proposal would broaden the technology activities covered...

Related Coverage

BRICS Parliamentary Forum Opens in Delhi Monday: The Agenda

NEW DELHI, October 25: India is preparing to host the 12th BRICS Parliamentary Forum...

Singapore Haze: NEA Forecasts Possible Improvement on Sunday

SINGAPORE, October 25: Singapore’s National Environment Agency has forecast air quality in the moderate-to-unhealthy...

Johor Schools to Reopen on October 26 After Haze Closures

JOHOR BAHRU, October 25: Education institutions across Johor are to resume operations on Monday,...