October 30: Thailand’s Monetary Policy Committee has kept the policy rate at 1.00%, while forecasting slower economic growth next year. The Bank of Thailand’s October 28 decision highlights uneven gains from technology-related exports alongside pressure on smaller businesses and vulnerable households.
Key highlights
- The attending committee members supported the hold unanimously.
- One member was absent; the statement should not be reported as a full seven-member vote.
- The growth forecasts remain positive for both 2026 and 2027.
- Supply-side price risks and credit conditions remain in focus.
The central bank’s forecasts
| BOT forecast | 2026 | 2027 |
|---|---|---|
| Economic growth | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Headline inflation | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Core inflation | 1.2% | 1.3% |
The committee identified AI-related export demand and private investment as supports, but said benefits were concentrated. It also highlighted energy and El Niño-related price risks, household debt and continued contraction in SME credit.
Slower growth still means an expanding economy
Our calculation: the forecast growth rate declines by 0.3 percentage point between 2026 and 2027. Because both forecasts are positive, the projected change is a slowdown in expansion rather than an annual contraction in output.
That distinction matters when interpreting a cautious central-bank statement. A weaker growth rate can create pressure for particular sectors even while the total economy continues expanding. National growth and an individual household’s circumstances need not move together.
The forecasts are also conditional assessments. They should retain their forecast label until the relevant annual results are available, and subsequent policy decisions can incorporate new information.
Why a policy-rate hold is not a freeze on every loan
The central bank’s benchmark is one component of the financial environment. A particular borrower’s interest rate also depends on the product, contract, lender and risk assessment. An unchanged policy rate does not establish that every new or existing loan will carry an unchanged price.
Credit availability is a further question. The rate charged to approved borrowers and whether a smaller business can obtain finance are different aspects of credit conditions. Tracking only the policy percentage can miss the second issue.
The BOT’s discussion of weaker SME lending therefore remains relevant even when the headline decision is to hold. The next useful evidence would show the terms and reach of lending, rather than assume that one benchmark describes every borrower’s experience.
Headline and core inflation answer different questions
Headline inflation captures the broader consumer-price measure. Core inflation is designed to look through specified volatile components. Reading both can help distinguish a change associated with those components from a broader pattern.
Neither forecast describes the price change of every item bought by a family. A household’s spending mix can differ from the composition of an aggregate index. The figures provide a national outlook; item-level prices and actual budgets provide a more specific picture.
Supply-side risks also complicate the policy trade-off because their effect on costs can coexist with weaker demand. The committee’s assessment should be followed through the subsequent data rather than converted into a certain prediction about its next decision.
What to watch
The next inflation, tourism, export and credit releases will help test the assumptions behind the outlook. Any future rate decision needs its own official statement. The accompanying file photo shows the Bank of Thailand Learning Centre in Bangkok in 2022, not the October 28 committee meeting.
Sources
The Business Desk covers markets, the economy, companies and personal finance. Stories are checked against at least two credible sources before publication.
